AI Project Remediation

Mayordomo's flagship AI engagement for UK teams with a stalled or failed build: match failure patterns, run a fixed seven-step recover-and-realign method, and leave a maintainable baseline your engineers own without needing us forever.

Hands-on in the code and delivery system. Free recovery discussion first, then fixed-scope work. We leave when your team owns the platform, not when a retainer becomes comfortable.

  • Discover & audit: identify process and outcomes; inventory agents, models, usage, and risk
  • Stabilise & bound: freeze high-risk paths, then design bounded agentic pipelines
  • Optimise & control: token and performance wins after structure; metrics, guardrails, and evals
  • Audit & handover: prove clearance, leave runbooks, ownership stays with your staff

Founder-led senior delivery. Fixed scope. Ownership left with your team.

Seven-step agentic recovery process: identify process and outcomes; audit agents, models, usage and risk; stabilise high-risk paths; design bounded pipelines; optimise token and performance; metrics, guardrails and evals; audit and handover.

The Problem We Solve

AI-assisted delivery often produces systems that look complete in demos but fail under real ownership: unclear boundaries, missing tests, secrets only one person understands, and no safe path to production.

Teams face a false choice: abandon the work, or pour more spend into the same approach. There is a third path: recover what is live, re-fit it to real needs, and leave a maintainable baseline your team can own.

Who This Is For

  • CTOs and Heads of Engineering with a stalled, fragile, or failed AI-driven build that must hold in production.
  • Teams that inherited quick AI-built platforms they cannot safely own, operate, or hand over.
  • Founders who need an honest salvage-vs-rewrite assessment before more spend on the same path.
  • UK product companies on .NET and Azure who want recovery that ends in handback, not a permanent outsourced platform team.

What We Deliver

Work in your repository and pipeline, not a slide deck. Outcomes the seven-step process leaves behind.

Honest process map

A clear picture of how work actually runs, what outcomes matter, and which agents, models, and usage paths create risk or waste.

Stabilised high-risk paths

Unsafe tools, spend, and production-critical flows frozen or constrained so change is safe before new pipelines go in.

Bounded agentic pipelines

Workflows with roles, handoffs, and failure paths that replace ad-hoc prompts, plus token and performance tuning once structure exists.

Metrics, guardrails, handback

Quality, cost, and policy signals; evals for regression; runbooks and exit criteria so your engineers own the baseline after we leave.

How We Work

A fixed seven-step process for agentic and multi-model setups that fail under real use. We map the work, audit the stack, stabilise risk before building, then optimise and control so the exit is ownership, not another black box.

Engineering that holds up in production.

  1. 1
    Identify current process & outcomes

    How work actually runs today, and what success means for the business.

  2. 2
    Audit agents, models, usage & risk

    Inventory tools, models, and spend; surface security and ownership hotspots.

  3. 3
    Stabilise high-risk paths

    Freeze unsafe use and production-critical flows so change is safe again.

  4. 4
    Design bounded agentic pipelines

    Replace ad-hoc prompts with workflows that have roles, handoffs, and failure paths.

  5. 5
    Optimise token & performance

    Cut waste and raise throughput once structure exists, not before.

  6. 6
    Metrics, guardrails & evals

    Quality, cost, and policy signals; regression checks that hold under real traffic.

  7. 7
    Audit and handover

    Prove clearance, leave runbooks and exit criteria, ownership with your staff.

Discover and audit first

We start with what is live: process, agents, models, usage, and risk, not a greenfield fantasy. Until the real work and the real stack are mapped, pipeline work is guesswork. Steps 1 and 2 give an honest salvage-vs-rewrite-vs-retire read before anything new is built.

Stabilise, then bound

High-risk paths freeze before new agentic work lands. Then we design bounded pipelines that replace ad-hoc tool use, so the system matches how the business actually works, not the chat history that built it.

Optimise, control, hand over

Token and performance work comes after structure. Metrics, guardrails, and evals make failure modes visible. Handover is the exit: runbooks, uplift, and a baseline your staff can run under real traffic. Full commercial recovery scope is this engagement: free discussion, fixed-scope stabilisation, handback.

What You Leave With

  • A clear technical assessment of what is salvageable, what to rewrite carefully, and what to drop.
  • A production baseline with tests, monitoring, and deploy discipline that matches the risk of the system.
  • A sequenced roadmap your team can execute without another cycle of silent architectural drift.
  • Named ownership for services, data, and run paths so onboarding does not depend on one person’s memory.
  • A handback package: decision log, risks, and operating notes so your engineers continue without a permanent outside team.

Book Free Recovery Discussion

Send the stalled system outline, stack, symptoms, and timeline. Robert replies with an honest engineering read. Free, no obligation.

Or email info@mayordomo.co.uk with a short outline.